A new service called PayPerPost is causing something of a brouhaha out there in the internets. Advertisers use the service, bloggers sign up and blog about products for cash. The reason for the curtain twitching is, of course, the lack of disclosure and the idea that this could pollute our blogosphere. The bloggers that are taken seriously, linked to, commented on and commissioned to write for commercial publications will likely have more interest in ScooptWords than marketing/PR shoddily passed of as 'user generated content' via PayPerPost. But, one thing's for sure, they've certainly kicked up a stink. Here's some of the reaction I've picked up on,
"We're
on the cusp of a tragedy of the marketing commons, and trust and credibility in the "oh so promising" consumer-generated media (CGM) space -- particularly the blogosphere -- are the rapidly depleting resources. PayPerPost.com,
which basically pays consumers to write reviews on blogs about brands,
products, or companies, is far from the first or only online abuser of
the "commons," but it's clearly the most audacious and outrageous.
It's also the most unrepentant -- what with the CEO seemingly relishing
in every blog byte of negative publicity or criticism about his model," from Consumer Generated Media.
"Is this a bad joke designed to torpedo the blogosphere’s credibility in
general? It doesn’t appear to be. If we’re all trying to negotiate a
space between Hollywood and mainstream journalism, this is taking
things way too far towards the most insipid parts of Hollywood," from Techcrunch.
"I should say that I don’t mind the idea of sponsored posts or being
paid to write things about a company - but I’d want to ensure that that
type of post was transparent and that the post added some value to the
reader’s experience. While I don’t know anything apart from what is on their site,
PayPerPost leaves me feeling a little uneasy and I’d recommend caution
to bloggers,"
says ProBlogger.
"I can’t blame them for trying. I don’t think this is evil. I do
think this will be a tremendous hassle for blogging because it because
it blurs the line between marketing and non-marketing content. I’m also deeply skeptical that companies will pay for a post if the
entire concept is in general disrepute — it’s like paying for bad PR.
And speaking of which, I don’t think companies will pay unless they can
ensure a positive result, which seems like a logistical impossibility," from Publishing 2.0.
For what it's worth, I doubt PayPerPost will last too long, but the idea might. With the blogosphere as large as it is, and representing all walks of life, there will always be those who'll gladly take the unethical, undisclosed buck. Hopefully they won't be the majority or the loudest voices.
Viva la 'J' list
The New York Times runs a short feature on journalists, namely Om Malik, Rafat Ali and Nina Munk, who've gone it alone, left the deadwood behind, received varying degrees of funding and made a success of it. The money quote comes from Ali,
Gloom and doom in the press is one thing, but look beyond these 'A' listers who are scurrying their way out rather successfully and you'll discover a whole lot more bloggers earning $100 in Adsense here, $1000 there, a commission this month, a BlogAd next month, a new contact today, a regular client tomorrow. These bloggers who find their blog 'leads to something unexpected' far outweigh those like Malik, Ali and Munk who impress with headlines, but who represent the more freakish corner of blogdom.
Technorati Tags: benefits of blogging, blog marketing
Posted by Graham Holliday on July 25, 2006 at 10:20 AM in Blogs, Cash from content, Commentary | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)